| Disappearing Bodyguards |
| |
Some time ago, I blogged about our wealthy Chinese neighbours, whose stretch Mercedes and phalanx of bodyguards fasincated everyone else in the compound where we live. Recently I saw the baby of the house going trick or treating accompanied both by his nanny and by a bodyguard. But there's been a big change. The house is dark, apparently abandoned. No nanny, no child, no Stretch Mercedes sweeping through the compound..Most obviously, no miniature army of bodyguards. Our neighbour - let's call him Mr Huang - along with his brother, another Mr Huang - heads a Chinese retail company with branches all over the country. Both brothers have reportedly been detained by the police and are being questioned about stock manipulation. I miss the bodyguards, who have in the past gone to great lengths to helped us to catch our errant pet rabbit, Dusty, chasing him through the undergrowth of an overgrown abandoned garden.
Here's my original post:
| Who's Moving In? |
| |
|
We live in a residential development which was originally built to house expatriates but which has now become home to many wealthy Chinese. We had a famous Chinese pop singer here for a while, and rumours of an actress. Mysteriously, several residents have cars with numberplates belonging to the People’s Armed Police. I say mysteriously, because in China public servants don’t earn the kind of salaries that can pay the mortgage or the rent on a house. So quite what the People’s Armed Police are doing here isn’t entirely clear.
Recently, another mystery has been playing itself out in front of our eyes. Directly opposite our house is a large house that for the past several months has undergone huge renovations. The place has been gutted and rebuilt bigger than ever, windows smashed and replaced, gardens landscaped…still, no sign of a new occupier.
Until this week, that is, when every evening, from about 9 pm onwards, a team of well-dressed young men and women has been busily readying the house for its new occupant, aided by uniformed maids with dusters. Their efforts have taken place in brightly lit rooms with large windows, and we’ve had no option but to observe their labours playing like a film on a big screen. We’re not the only ones who’ve been watching – the compound employs security guards, and several of these have abandoned their patrols to come and stand outside gazing as crystal chandeliers have been polished, remote-control curtains tested, pictures hung and pot plants trimmed.
Two nights ago, at one thirty in the morning, a stretch Mercedes was parked outside the house. A van arrived, and from it were brought box after box. These were delivered to the team in the house, who unpacked items from the boxes and then sent the empty boxes back out to be chucked over the wall of the empty house next door.
Next morning, I looked out the window to see two security guards rummaging among the empty boxes, looking to see whether there was anything worth salvaging. One of them found two silver tiaras decorated with pink fronds. He removed his beret and replaced it with the tiara so that the pink fronds hung coquettishly over his eyes. Both guards fell around laughing for a few moments. Then the guard replaced his beret, and they walked off, tiaras in hand, well-pleased by their find.
Since then we’ve seen the new occupier fleetingly, sitting in a leather armchair at a computer, and surrounded by men who seem to be bodyguards as he gets in and out of his stretch Mercedes. He’s a dapper Chinese man in his forties, I’d say, who wears dark suits with a yellow silk tie, and he has a wife and a young child. I’ve started my enquiries into who our new neighbour might be, but can’t tell you yet. We just hope he continues to live his glamorous life in bright light, and with the curtains wide open.
|
|
| |
26 November 2008 | 8:06:35 AM |
comments (4) |
| China's Hawaii |
| |
We've spent the past week in Hainan, an island off the south coast of China, at Yalong Bay in Sanya. It's advertised as China's Hawaii. And as you can see, it's very pretty, with golden beach and blue sea and surf (and even a Chinese tourist in a Hawaiian suit.)

I first went to Sanya nearly twenty years ago, when there was nothing but beach and surf, and not a hotel in sight, but you could see the potential even then. The natural beach is really amazing. Now the whole bay has been developed so it is lined with Marriotts and Sheratons and Ritz Carltons and Crowne Plazas. The Chinese military - not to be outdone - has also developed the area just around the corner with a big naval base, so destroyers can be spotted sailing to and fro across the shining sea. When James and Alistair went kayaking, they were warned to stay well away from the military base, because it was 'very dangerous'.
For some reason that I can't work out, it's a destination very popular with Russian tourists.
In the week that we were there, the taxi drivers went on strike, as they did in two other cities (and have done elsewhere since.) They complained that they had to pay exorbitant fees to the authorities, while the same authorities failed to take action against unlicensed cabs that stole their business. Some of the protesters called for the setting up of an independent taxi drivers' union.
Update: Since my return to Beijing, I've talked to local taxi drivers here, who have similar complaints. They are aware that the protests elsewhere in the country are being met with some concessions, and also with arrests. They also know that the authorities are far more worried about protests in the capital than anywhere else. One of their biggest complaints is the price of petrol - they know perfectly well that the price of oil has dropped. So why haven't prices dropped at the pumps?
|
| |
15 November 2008 | 10:44:01 AM |
comments (0) |
| Democracy |
| |
From my outpost in Hong Kong I’m watching history unfold.
I spent two years living in the States. Today a majority of Americans have voted to reclaim the best of what I saw there – passion, energy, generosity, vision. They’ve voted to do more than correct the vicious extremism of the Bush-Cheney years, they’ve taken a historic step that no one could have predicted, expanding and strengthening their democracy and voting for social inclusion and justice. Given the reality of American power, this is an event which spells hope for all of us. But – and this is the history - black people, men and women, have been leaving the polls in tears. Obama has given a voice to the millions who felt that they were disenfranchised.
Which of course brings me to China. When China has, for years, been the biggest economic success story in the world, and when the standards of living for many Chinese are improving, when polling suggests that a vast majority of people are optimistic, why do people like me harp on about political reform? What’s wrong with a dictatorship, as long as it responds – as this one increasingly does – to popular grievance?
Well, step back a bit and you see that China is going through its own extremist swing towards a ruthless capitalism that could be termed devil take the hindmost. Certainly the central government is trying to address issues like healthcare because they understand that it is potentially explosive, but the statistics are absolutely dire. One article in a state-run newspaper last week suggested that only 10% of cases of childhood leukaemia can be treated, because the vast majority of parents cannot afford to pay even to attempt to save their child. This in a country which owns much of America’s debt, which has an active space programme, and which is on paper committed social justice. America’s record on healthcare is atrocious, but there’s no Medicare here.
Step back a bit further, and you see that China’s history since 1949 has been a series of swings – some of which, like the extreme leftist Great Leap Forward, and the Cultural Revolution, have left millions dead. The present swing to a corrupt right will leave its own death toll. From a purely pragmatic point of view, democracy, with the constant challenge of an active opposition, the pressure to find consensus, along with the necessary accompaniment of a free press and independent courts seems to me to represent the best (but never perfect) corrective to extremism.
Beyond this, I believe that political impotence is potentially toxic. Today what we are frequently seeing in China is that the disenfranchised are driven to extreme measures. Often these are self-destructive – the suicide rate is high. Sometimes they are vengeful. Recently, a man called Yang Jia murdered six police officers in Shanghai. Unsurprisingly, he has been sentenced to death. What has been astounding has been the outpouring of displeasure on the internet about the sentence. It seems that he was beaten up by the police and, unable to get anyone to listen to his complaint, he turned to murder. The revenge of course was totally out of all proportion to the grievance suffered. Nevertheless, people on the internet said they wanted to know the whole story and questioned whether Yang Jia should be held entirely accountable when the system offered him no outlet for his grievance. This is not an isolated incident. Democracy – and by this I mean the press, the courts as well as the polling booth - even when it is flawed, as it is everywhere it exists – provides an absolutely necessary outlet for potentially explosive buildups of grievance.
Beyond even that, I believe there is a profound but unmeasurable effect on the individual who feels she or he has a voice. The Chinese I meet are under no illusion that they have any impact on the future governance of their country. But many of them seek a voice. The internet is the clearest indication of that – it is full of debate, much of which is silenced, some of which is not. At the moment, China has side-stepped the ballot box and is practicing the populism of the internet forum. An economic boom is one thing, a healthy country is quite another.
|
| |
05 November 2008 | 2:12:02 PM |
comments (0) |
| The Transformational Internet |
| |
The internet has already played a role in what may later today - bated breath - be a transformation of US politics. Here's what the internet is doing in China:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article5077899.ece |
| |
04 November 2008 | 9:11:00 AM |
comments (0) |
| All a Writer Wants to Hear |
| |
I'm in Hong Kong for a few days. Here is the view from my window. It's what's known as a partial harbour view.

A British man who works in the Macmillan office here told me a nice story this morning. He has a domestic helper working in his home (this being Hong Kong she is likely an English-speaking Filipina, although I didn't confirm this). He discovered that she had removed my first book, Falling Off Air, from his bookshelf. A few days later it returned, and the next book, Out of Mind, had gone. That's all a writer wants to hear. |
| |
04 November 2008 | 8:24:59 AM |
comments (2) |
| Our little piece of history |
| |
The air, over the past few days, has been vile. Back to pre-Olympic smog, despite regulations to keep twenty per cent of the cars off the road Monday to Friday (we can't use our car on Friday, and the inconvenience is already stretching my committment to the environment). You can smell the dirt in the air. I had been toying with the idea of buying an extra air purifier for the house, and looking out of the window convinced me that the time was right. I made the call to Mike, the genius who realised a couple of years ago that there might be quite a market here for IQAir units - the gold standard of the air purifier industry. I asked what discount he might give me as an old customer (just about any purchasing conversation goes like this in China), and he offered me a little piece of history. Instead of an entirely new machine, I could have - at 15% off full price - a machine used for just five weeks by the Olympic delegation. And now here it sits, humming in our sitting room, gently blowing nice clear air over us, just as it might well have blown nice clean air all over Michael Phelps! Or at least over a junior coach. |
| |
22 October 2008 | 5:53:19 AM |
comments (1) |
| Kidnapped Children, Religious Music, and other matters |
| |
For anyone reading The Slaughter Pavilion and interested in the story of the vanishing children, you might be interested in this from the very excellent Global Voices Online. http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/10/08/china-40-missing-children-parents-journey-in-beijing/ Sadly, the fiction in The Slaughter Pavilion is not without some basis.
This week, I wrote a blog for the Guardian's Comment is Free section on the banning of Western religious music from concert halls. The ban has not been made public but is, as far as I understand, common knowledge in the concert halls of the capital. No one knows why exactly the authorities have done this, but in my view it's part of a general trend towards the left, that is, towards a more inward-looking China and increased paranoia about exchanges with the West, and fear of Christianity. You can link to my blog here (why the link mentions tibet, I do not know.) http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/oct/08/china.tibet
Also, I've had two lovely reviews for The Slaughter Pavilion in the last few days. One, by Matthew Lewin writing in The Guardian, can be read here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/sep/20/crime.roundupreviews2
And from Susanna Yager writing in The Sunday Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2008/10/05/bocrime105.xml |
| |
11 October 2008 | 11:38:40 AM |
comments (0) |
| Reasons To Frown |
| |
I've written a blog on the Guardian's Comment is Free site about the stresses on the Communist Party leadership post- OIympics. As the concern surrounding the melamine-tainted milk powder spreads, and all domestically-produced dairy products are removed from shelves, the Communist Party now faces a major food safety scandal. The World Health Organisation is now asking what the central leadership knew and when. They want to know whether the delay in taking timely action was because of a cover-up or simply because of a failure of systems. Among people I've spoken to here, no one is surprised that the Central government knew that children were getting sick way back in July but did not issue a recall for the tainted milk powder until September, and people assume that the centre covered-up because of the Olympics. Anyway, here's the link to the piece I wrote for Comment is Free, complete with comments from several people who seem to believe that no one should raise questions about anything going on in China. Try telling that to the World Health Organisation. Try also telling that to the many Chinese who are desperate for a more responsible and responsive government:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/17/china.olympics2008 |
| |
20 September 2008 | 9:51:16 AM |
comments (2) |
| Who Knew What and When? |
| |
The Paralympics ends tomorrow, and already the Olympic decorations are being dismantled.

The facade of perfection also begins to crumble.
Over the past two days, news has begun to emerge of more than a thousand babies sickened by infant formula tainted by melamine. Two babies have died. What is not yet clear is who knew what and when, but it seems that the New Zealand partner to China's Sanlu manufacturer was pushing for a recall of the product even before the Olympics, but that Chinese officials refused. When New Zealand representatives brought the matter up in Beijing with Chinese officials, a recall was eventually made, too late for many babies who had developed kidney stones.
So, did Beijing know about the tainted milk product and allow it to continue to be sold in order not to disrupt the image of the games? We know that news organisations were ordered not to report on food safety problems during the Olympics. Or did over-zealous local officials hide the scandal not only from the public, but from their bosses in Beijing?
After a series of scandals, food safety is an immensely sensitive issue here, and not only as it relates to the Olympics (there were worries that athletes might become ill). This morning I was chatting with a taxi driver, who told me that he meets up for lunch with other drivers every day, but that he avoids small restaurants because of the poor quality of their ingredients. 'Eat there and you get a tummy ache,' he told me, and then suggested that tummy ache was the least of the problems - many people, he said, were suffering from cancer and leukaemia in Beijing, and he put this down to tainted foods. True or not, food safety is a potential minefield for the Communist Party as it tries to retain the trust of the population.
Like many expatriates here, we buy a lot of imported food, from New Zealand milk to German fruit juice and US honey. Increasingly, those Chinese who can afford to, do the same. |
| |
16 September 2008 | 4:58:25 AM |
comments (0) |
| When is the Paralympics not the Paralympics? |
| |
Ask many people in the West what the para in Paralympics stands for, and they may hesitate, wondering whether it is something to do with paralysis, or whether it means parallel, as in games that run alongside the Olympics. It is the second, para as in paramedics. These are the Parallel Olympics.

However, in China the Games have been translated erroneously as the "Can Aoyun", or the Disabled Olympics. It's an easy mistake, of course, but it does nonetheless reflect the fact that China's level of awareness when it comes to disability is not as sensitive as it might be.
We're hearing a lot about China's efforts to help people with disabilities, but in fact they've suffered terrible discrimination for years. I know one excellent linguist who is entirely self taught, but was not allowed to attend university because of her hunch back. I know a teenage girl who is a member of the national troupe of disabled entertainers. She's become something of a star, singing sweet songs from her wheelchair, but she's been treated heartlessly as her condition deteriorates by the very officials charged with helping those with disability.
Still, we went to the Opening Ceremony in the Bird's Nest, and joined a crowd of about ninety thousand people there to witness another brilliantly choreographed spectacle. When the Chinese team emerged into the arena, the crowd went wild.

History moves in mysterious ways, and perhaps nationalism will do as much for disability awareness in China as anything else. I don't know who first dreamed up the Paralympics, but it is an entirely brilliant concept to stage something so challenging on the back of the Olympics. Crowds are already enthused, stadiums built, and a whole new world of achievement is presented seamlessly after the main event.
We have seen big crowds at events, tickets seem to have sold well. Security is less oppressive than for the Olympics, and the sky is still blue - there are many Paralympic pleasures to be had.
I've been interested to watch the reactions of my children, who are as enthused about the Paralympics as about the Olympics. It occurs to me that children are much closer to the idea of games, and understand that all games are constructed from fairly arbitrary rules designed to handicap the players. What, after all, is the difference between a three-legged race, in which competitors have to race despite a handicap, and the 50km walk, in which competitors have to race whilst never taking both feet from the ground at the same time, and basketball played in wheelchairs or blindfold?

|
| |
12 September 2008 | 6:22:26 AM |
comments (2) |
| Over The Top |
| |
We watched the closing ceremony last night on television - a huge North Korean style extravaganza. I couldn't make head or tail of it, although the plethora of aliens in bicycle helmets and glowing green men suggested some kind of space race theme. (This is entirely speculative, but it would vaguely make sense, since the opening ceremony depicted China's history and thus the closing ceremony might depict the future, and China certainly has space travel ambitions. If anyone has any better ideas, let me know.) If you think I'm trying to read too much into it, rest assured that there is no state-sponsored cultural event in China that does not carry a message, and we now know that from leaks to the press that the opening and closing ceremonies were subject to massive political intervention.
The best, I thought, that could be said of London's uninspiring display was that at least it didn't involve thousands of soldiers who'd been rehearsed to the limits of their endurance in order to please the politburo's endless tweaking of the show. But what political vision did Beijing's ceremony portray? I can't even begin to think. If all this sounds sour, the comparison to North Korea comes from Zhang Yimou himself, who directed both shows.
Interesting, I thought, that Jacques Rogge's speech referred not to a wonderful or fantastic Olympics, but to a diplomatically and neutrally worded 'exceptional' Olympics. For the IOC, dealing with Beijing has been like nothing they've ever had to do before. He thanked the thousands of volunteers - who were unfailingly cheerful - before he thanked BOCOG, the Beijing Olympic organising committee.
And yet, despite the almost tragic politics of the thing, I am a convert to the Olympics. I am not a sports fan, and thought I would be left cold. But I was wowed by the athletic prowess I saw, and moved by the teamwork, and by the extraordinary effort. On Friday, we went to the Bird's Nest and watched the end of the 50km men's walk. It's a strange sport, to my mind, with the athletes surely having to struggle not to run. But one couldn't help but be full of admiration when these men, who'd walked through 50km in the roasting heat, collapsing when they got to the finishing line.

Some of the most impressive athletes have been the Chinese, who won more gold medals than any other country. Every athlete from every country is of course under pressure to perform. But it has been very evident that the Chinese athletes are under exponentially greater pressure to perform in order to fulfil the leadership's gold medal ambitions. After the match in which the Chinese women's volleyball team won bronze, their coach was interviewed on Chinese television. The interviewer asked whether there had been too much pressure, and the coach burst into tears. Athletes had been told - although he didn't say this - that a gold medal was the only medal that counted.
The Bird's Nest is a beautiful stadium, stunning from outside and intimate inside. Although whoever chose the lights made a mistake.

At the moment, the media seems to be portraying the Bird's Nest and the surrounding Olympic Green, as the new heart of Beijing, replacing the politically problematic Tiananmen Square. But at the moment it's a vast concrete slab, unrelentingly free of shade, and it's a vast tranche of real estate. The end of the Olympics leaves China's leadership facing many challenges. The Olympic Green is only one of them.

Meanwhile, to put all this in perspective, on Saturday afternoon we went to the Crab Island water park, thinking that it would be empty because everyone would be gathered around their televisions watching the Olympics. We were wrong, everyone was at the beach.

|
| |
25 August 2008 | 1:03:06 AM |
comments (0) |
| Beijing's New Forbidden City |
| |
Discouraged from visiting the Olympics, the city's inhabitants watch them on TV - or rather, they watch an edited version. To read the whole of this blog, go to http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/aug/15/olympics2008.china/print
Lying directly north of the Forbidden City, Beijing's Olympic Green slots symbolically into the capital's symmetry of great historical sites. In imperial times, ordinary citizens were forbidden access to the vast palace complex of the Forbidden City. Now they are similarly banned from Zhongnanhai, a palace adjoining the Forbidden City that has been adopted by the Communist party as its leadership compound.
Beijingers are used to being banned from sections of their city. So it comes as no great surprise to them that access to the Olympic Green – which dwarfs the Forbidden City – has been severely restricted with road blocks and fences cutting off access to all those without a ticket. CCTV cameras and guards reinforce the barriers to entry. At other Olympics, the Olympic Green has been a place for the general public to gather. It is an important place for sponsors, because it is where they spend money to advertise. They have complained that only about 40,000 people a day are passing through Beijing's Olympic Green, as opposed to the 200,000 they would expect....
...
Yesterday I watched China Central Television highlights from the women's weightlifting. Over and again they replayed the failed attempts by weightlifters from other countries. When the foreign athletes stumbled or fell, the clip was played not once or twice, but several times. Eventually, China's gold medal winner was shown doing what no one else had managed to do. To China's leaders, it counts as a double success to have cleared the streets of security risks and to have people watching television at home. On television, error and success is not fleeting. The editing process can hone the message and send it again and again, and the message for the domestic audience is clear: China is a success, and the Olympics have shown the world that China is a success.
|
| |
19 August 2008 | 2:46:49 PM |
comments (0) |
| The Big Screen |
| |
It being Sunday, we did what many families traditionally do on a Sunday afternoon, which was to go for a walk in the park. We'd been told there was all sorts of excitement going on at Ditan, so off we went eagerly, especially interested in the big screen, which relays Olympic action from the television.
Yesterday, the Beijing organisers of the games struck back at those who said there was no Olympic excitement for ordinary people, issuing this statement: "The live sites are parts of Olympic culture building in Beijing for citizens in Beijing, and friends and journalists and tourists from China and abroad, for the athletes and officials and other visitors. The live sites provide the best opportunity for them to take direct participation in the festive activities and the ambience of the Olympic Games.
Since the 13th of July, the opening of all the live sites, at every live sites, a colorful and rich variety of activities has been staged including performance troupes from other provinces and other countries. Dance troupes and choirs and non professional amateur performers at the community level, they are consisted of a large format screens and cultural showcases, the exchange of emblems and souvenirs."
Well, in Ditan, on what should be a busy weekend afternoon, this is what we found:

AND we had to go through a security check to get to the screen. Throughout Ditan park there were vast numbers of police and plainclothes police. Vendors at a craft fair complained that there were very few customers. And this is what one drinks concession looked like:

|
| |
17 August 2008 | 2:50:35 PM |
comments (0) |
| A Clear Olympic Sky and Flyweight Watching |
| |
Today, we had lunch in the picturesque Ritan Park, which is one of the three designated protest areas. There was, of course, not a protester in sight. Not much visible security, either. Presumably the authorities already know full well that there won't be any protesters.
In the evening we went to the Worker's Gymnasium to watch the boxing. After Thursday's torrential rain, the sky was utterly clear, with scudding white clouds and views of the mountains in the distance. This was the view in the early evening - not a whiff of pollution.

This is so different from the pall of smog that usually covers the sky.
After half an hour sitting there not knowing what was going on, we had to Google the rules of boxing, after which things became a little clearer. The crowd was interested if not excited....until Zou Shiming appeared. Suddenly, the stadium developed powerful lungs, yelling 'Jia you, jia you!' I wouldn't have liked to be Zou's opponent who, as if to rub salt in the wound, was French (the most hated nation if you are a Chinese nationalist.) But then I wouldn't have much liked to be Zou either - the weight of expectation on these athletes is palpable. Several who have not done as well as expected have collapsed in tears. They are told that the only thing worth having is a gold. Anyway, the crowd loved Zou.

Especially when he beat (literally) his French opponent.

|
| |
16 August 2008 | 5:03:21 PM |
comments (0) |
| Soaked Again |
| |
I took all the children and one of their friends miles out of town to the water sports centre to watch the rowing yesterday, and it was such a hellish experience it's taken me 24 hours to be able to write about it.
We arrived at 2, as instructed, decked out in sunhats and sunscreen. In fact it was already raining but we were still hopeful. We took our seats in the stand, wrapped ourselves in the plastic capes the volunteers give out, and gritted our teeth.

Then the rain got heavier, thunder began to roar, lightning flashed, black clouds rolled overhead.... the rowing was postponed for an hour, and we all sat in utter misery without any shelter assuming that the organisers knew that this bad weather was about to blow over. At this point it was too wet even to get my camera out - my mobile phone got so wet that it stopped working. Then, after we'd sat there for an hour and a half, the weather getting worse rather than better.... the rowing was cancelled.
And several thousand people all flooded out of the stadium at the same time. There were crowds a dozen deep all along the roadside. I worried about losing a child, and insisted we all hang onto each other. By clambering across a muddy ditch and climbing up the other side, we managed to talk our way onto a bus and even get seats. But still it took us two and a half hours to get home....By which time we had been soaked to the skin for four hours.
I was told I could use my tickets again today, but by the time we got home I simply couldn't face the idea of starting all over again, so I gave my tickets away. Today, of course, in blue skies and gorgeous sunshine, I have been regretting that. Still, it would have taken a lot to get me to trek all the way out there again.
A friend who went to a different event yesterday said she felt the security checks had got stricter - she had a biro confiscaated because it was 'too sharp', and her husband was told he couldn't take his Toblerone into the venue, so he ate it on the spot. I was told I couldn't take in a packet of mint imperials. But when I blanched at the thought of eating them all up, and said I'd throw them away, they softened and allowed me in. The security checks remain good natured, but the security obsession seems to be deepening. Armoured personnel carriers have appeared on the Olympic Green, and sponsors have complained that too few ordinary people are being allowed into the open spaces around the venues.
James took Alistair and Kirsty to hockey this morning, and they got sunburned not soaked. I have been trying to track down some other tickets - there's an online market in unwanted tickets. But there's almost nothing left. The only option was boxing tomorrow night. It's a brutal sport, of course, and we shouldn't encourage it. But most importanly it takes place indoors, so we'll all have seats ringside tomorrow night.
|
| |
15 August 2008 | 3:42:47 PM |
comments (0) |
| Volleyball is fun...Hockey Leaves Me Cold... and Concerts are Cancelled |
| |
On Saturday, an evening of volleyball converted me to the Olympics - I hadn't realised sports could be so much fun. I resolved to try to get tickets to more events. The women in black and white are cheerleaders, by the way, not players. And the characters in the inflatable plastic suits are the fuwa mascots, not players either.
On Sunday the girls and I sat under umbrellas and swathed in plastic capes in a rainstorm waiting for a hockey game. After an hour waiting, watching the teams warm up in pouring rain, every swipe at the ball sending up gallons of water from the pitch, and soaked to the skin, our good spirits flagged. Shortly after the game started with thunder roaring overhead, we gave up. How the teams played on, I have no idea. We went to the information kiosk (below) for directions home. About a dozen friendly volunteers scratched their heads and consulted maps and frowned and took photos of the girls. I gave up and headed for a bus.... any bus. But to give them credit, one of the volunteers raced after us and followed us onto the bus. Panting, he told us he'd worked out a route for us. It took us two hours to get home by crowded, steaming, bus, then underground, then taxi. but it was a good route, and home we got.

Today I tried booking us tickets for performances advertised in the official Olympics publications - how great, I thought, that we can live in Beijing and see modern dance from New York, and megastar violinists from Italy, and Hairspray in the Great Hall of the People, and Cuban ballet.... But of course we can't. Every performance I wanted to see had been cancelled. I assume it's the Bjork effect - she shouted out 'Free Tibet' after a concert in Shanghai last year. Now it seems the authorities have decided they can't trust foreign performers on their stages. |
| |
11 August 2008 | 4:01:04 PM |
comments (0) |
| Day One |
| |
The morning dawned hazy. I went to a talk by Norman Foster - who designed Beijing’s new aiport - and Ai Weiwei, a Chinese artist who has recorded the building of the new aiport in photographs. Last week Ai Weiwei accused China’s leadership of turning China into a police state in advance of the Olympics. Before the talk began, we were warned we must limit our questioning to the subject of the airport and to keep off politics and The Olympics. We were all very obedient, but Ai Weiwei seemed to chafe at the bit. Sarcastically, he said he hoped we’d all enjoy the blue sky days we were about to enjoy.
The roads around the city were already becoming difficult to navigate because the police kept closing them for official delegations. I guess it’s like this all over the world, and wherever the Olympics takes place. I saw people taking each other's picture in front of an Olympics countdown clock as it ticked down the last minutes and hours. I saw a lot of police. I saw very few Western tourists, and the taxi drivers I spoke to agreed that there were very few.
This evening we attempted to find a big screen outside to watch the opening ceremony. We had heard that Chinese were being urged to stay at home rather than gathering on the street. Sure enough, when we got to our nearest open air venue, Chaoyang Park, the screen was declared out of order. We were suspicious. We got back in a taxi and set off in the direction of another open air screen, but found ourselves gridlocked in traffic. In the end, rather than sit in traffic all evening, we did a U-turn and headed back to the Lido Holiday Inn, where we’d earlier spotted a screen outdoors. But there was no room at the Holiday Inn - Samsung, one of the Olympic sponsors, was hosting a private party there. Local bars with tv screens were full.
So, with no place to go but home, we visited the local grocery store for supplies of popcorn and fizzy drinks, and found it full of local Chinese stocking up for the evening’s tv watching. The tv was on in the grocery store, and everyone was watching the countdown to the opening ceremony while they queued.
Back at home, on our comfy sofas and with a mountain of food to eat, we watched as the ceremony began with fireworks that burst above the packed Bird’s Nest stadium and the near-deserted city. Then thousands of People’s Liberation Army soldiers from the Cultural corps, in a spectacle of awesome discipline, began to bang their drums to the glory of China...
|
| |
08 August 2008 | 5:57:07 PM |
comments (0) |
| Return to Beijing - the Deserted Beer Garden |
| |
I got back to Beijing yesterday morning at an unspeakable hour (5.45 in the morning), so 36 hours later I’m still finding my jet-lagged feet in pre-Olympic Beijing. These are my first impressions:
The air is as bad as it has been for months. The air is grey, so thick you could eat it. The sun hangs like a red golf ball in the sky, not shining, just glowing distantly through the smog. I can see no improvement in air quality, and an investigation on the BBC website at:
There seem to be very few Western tourists. I’ve been walking up and down along a street which boasts the Lido Holiday Inn, the Rosedale Hotel and the Yanxiang Hotel. I saw no more Westerners than usual, perhaps fewer. At about eight this evening, the Rosedale Hotel’s Beer Garden was empty. The Lido’s, complete with big screen sports coverage, was decidedly sleepy. This is not a scientific survey. Maybe all the tourists are hiding in the Olympic village.
Among the population of Beijing, opinion is polarized. Some people think the Olympics are the best thing since sliced bread and are genuinely excited.
Many taxi drivers have decorated their cars with Chinese flags. On our street, identically-sized Chinese flags hang above the storefronts (which have recently been renovated so that they too are identical.) All this flag-waving does not look like a spontaneous act of patriotic fervour – these bright new flags are not heirlooms dragged out of the attic for a special occasion.
Perhaps the flags have been issued, complete with instructions for flying them. One man described how tomorrow’s opening ceremony was going to be as happy an event as Chinese lunar new year, with families gathering around the TV set.
Other people are offended and angry because of what they describe as excessively heavy-handed security operations. ‘This should be a happy occasion,’ one man said to me. ‘Why do they have to be so anxious?’
There are staff at every bus stop who check bags of passengers for bombs. If you carry a bottle of water, you’re ordered to take a sip to prove it’s not toxic or explosive. If you refuse, you’re not allowed on the bus.
It goes beyond that. Around the city, posters have gone up asking people to inform on each other if they overhear subversives plotting against the government. ‘It’s just like the Cultural Revolution,’ said one man, referring to the bleakest years of Communist history, forty years ago, when people were encouraged to turn on one another. It is said now that if people make remarks criticizing the Olympics in public, they should expect to be taken away and detained until the Olympics are over.
I have spoken to no one who has direct knowledge of anyone being taken away, but the fact that people believe this is so is indicative of people’s state of mind. They feel their leaders don’t trust them (or why would they keep checking their bags?), they suspect that the security measures are as much about political dissent as about terrorism. In return, they are willing to believe the worst of the very leadership which seems to think the worst of them.
I have heard a few people mention an explosion on a bus in central Beijing last week, in which two people were allegedly injured. Again, it is not clear to me whether such an explosion actually happened, or whether people are observing the heavy-handed security measures that are disrupting their lives and are speculating that something specific must have triggered it.
|
| |
07 August 2008 | 4:38:20 PM |
comments (1) |
| Top Ten Beijing Fiction |
| |
Catherine Sampson's top 10 books on Beijing
The newly built Herzog de Meuron Olympic stadium in Beijing. Photograph: Iwan Baan
Catherine Sampson has lived in China for more than 15 years. Her fourth crime novel, The Slaughter Pavilion, is set in Beijing and features private detective Song Ren. It will be published in hardback by Macmillan on September 5. Her third novel, The Pool of Unease, in which private detective Song Ren was introduced, is now available in paperback. She has also contributed a short story to the book Beijing Portrait of a City, a collection of fiction, poetry and essays published by Odyssey which you can buy online here.
"Beijing is about to become host to what will be one of the most fascinating Olympics ever. I first came to Beijing in 1981, more than a quarter of a century ago. It was a sleepy place, where you couldn't get a taxi and the streets were full of bicycles. Restaurants were staffed by snapping waitresses and closed at eight o'clock. Because of astounding economic growth and because of the Olympics, the city has been transformed - but with restrictions on visas, traffic and public gatherings, Beijing could look like the world's most over-built ghost town come August. Great swathes of old alleyway housing and street markets have been demolished to make way for some of the world's most audacious skyscrapers and stunning sports facilities. But the history of this city is one of sometimes murderous political struggles. These ten novels and collections of short stories are rich in satire, and in metaphors for political oppression. Most of the books below are written by Chinese writers who have chosen to live abroad in order to write freely about their country."
1. Beijing Coma by Ma Jian
Published this year, Ma Jian describes the events that led up to the 1989 massacre in Beijing. He has found the perfect metaphor. Dai Wei, a student activist, lies paralysed years after being wounded during the army action of June 4. Those around him believe Dai Wei to be unconscious, but he can see and hear and, most importantly, remember. He is locked in - just as China is locked in - unable to speak or communicate freely, but silently remembering, unable to forget. The novel is rich in contemporary detail – doctors who gouge families for cash for treatment; bulldozers that threaten demolition of homes. Like much of the book, the intricate description of factional rivalries among students is rooted in fact. Ma Jian lives in London.
2. Please Don't Call Me Human by Wang Shuo
As a teenager, Wang Shuo ran wild in Beijing, and he writes in the slang of the capital. In Please Don't Call Me Human he's at his most scathingly satirical. In a thinly veiled reference to the Olympics, his Beijing taxi driver anti-hero competes in an international competition to find the nation most able to humiliate itself, with gory and gloriously symbolic results. Wang Shuo lives in Los Angeles.
3. A Thousand Years of Good Prayers by Yiyun Li
In this short story collection, Yiyun Li writes beautifully about the lives of ordinary people to tell the greater story of contemporary China. In Extra, the first story of the collection, she follows a middle-aged woman who has just been laid off from the bankrupt Beijing Red Star garment factory. The unemployed woman navigates the grim realities of modern China, first in a marriage of convenience, then as a cleaner for rich kids. Each ends tragically, but the woman catches a glimpse of love. Yiyun Li lives in the US.
4. The Uninvited by Yan Geling
This is a comic novel that gently lays bare all manner of social issues. Dan is an unemployed factory worker who discovers by accident that if he pretends to be a journalist he can attend press conferences. That means eating like a king at banquets laid on for the press, and receiving "red packets" of cash which amount to payment for writing adulatory stories. In fact he can make a comfortable living from his assumed identity. Things get more complicated as he is approached to write the stories of several people with grievances. He tries to help, with disastrous consequences. Yan Geling lives in the US.
5. The Crazed by Ha Jin
Here is another metaphor for the censorship of free expression in China, and again it is set during the student demonstrations of 1989. At a provincial university, Prof Yang suffers a stroke. His subsequent outbursts draw parallels between the cultural revolution and pre-Olympic China. This unsettles his student Jian Wan, who eventually leaves to go to Beijing to take part in the demonstrations. Ha Jin lives in the US. His novel Waiting won the National Book Award.
6. The Last Empress by Anchee Min
This is fictionalised history. Anchee Min has taken one of the most notorious women in Chinese history, the empress Dowager Cixi, and has turned her into a surprisingly accessible heroine. Drawn in by the first person narrative, the reader is taken into the heart of imperial life and witnesses first hand the life and death struggles between those who would open to the west and those who would turn China in on itself. It is a struggle that continues today in Zhongnanhai, the Communist party compound which occupies part of the old imperial palace. Anchee Min lives in California.
7. Servet the People by Yan Lianke
Yan Lianke lives in Beijing, and has said that this means he sometimes tones down what he writes. Nevertheless, Serve the People is an unashamed satire on the Communist party's instruction to "serve the people". A lowly cook working in the provinces takes the instruction too literally when his boss, a local party leader, leaves for Beijing, and the cook finds himself seduced by the official's wife.
8. I Love Dollars by Zhu Wen
Zhu Wen is another writer who chooses to live in Beijing. I Love Dollars is a collection of short stories that are often absurd and have a strong undercurrent of nihilism. Zhu, tongue firmly in cheek, debates the relative values of sex, political idealism and money.
9. The Dragon's Tail by Adam Williams
Williams' latest historical novel, The Dragon's Tail, follows British spy Harry Airton through the Japanese invasion, the cultural revolution, and up to the Beijing massacre of 1989. Williams' passion for China's modern history is rooted in his own family's experiences as expatriates in China during the same period, and in his own experience as a long-time Beijing resident. The result is engaging, enthusiastic storytelling.
10. Beijing Doll by Chun Sue
This is all teenage angst and boredom. Chun Sue is the name both of the author and the protagonist, and this is thinly veiled autobiography. Chun is pessimistic, rebellious and more interested in sex than in school. The book can feel as tedious as the narrator's life, but it is an interesting insight into a generation whose lives are as far from the Communist Youth League as from the moon. Don't be taken in. Beijing Doll tells only part of the story. Back in the late 80s, middle-aged people rolled their eyes about young people's shallow materialism. In 1989, millions of young people took to the streets nationwide calling for political change.
|
| |
03 August 2008 | 9:23:33 PM |
comments (0) |
| Which China? |
| |
Which China?
Don't confuse China's leadership with its people. There's a greater difference between them now than at any time since 1989
-
"What is not clear," Simon Jenkins wrote last Friday of the Beijing Olympics, "is who will win, China or its critics".
We all know what Simon Jenkins means: that China's Communist party leadership is winning the short-term race to host the Olympics on its own terms, but it may face trouble running the marathon – the longer-term struggle. I broadly agree with this analysis.
But when we use the word "China" to refer to the small group of party leaders who wield power, then we play the Communist party's game.
Saying "China" when what we mean is actually the tiny group of men who run the country is a shorthand that we've all used, myself included. Before you roll your eyes and accuse me of being picky, I would argue that it is extremely important now, in 2008, to make this distinction.
It is the Communist party which has, very cleverly, for decades, worked to conflate the greater good, patriotism, nationalism and one-party rule. That is why western media coverage is judged both inside and outside China to be either "pro-" or "anti-" China, when in many cases the western media is simply telling it how it is, or telling it as well as it can, given the limits on access. Is Simon Jenkins in fact using the Communist party's own vocabulary when he describes recent western press coverage of China as "hostile"?
More importantly, this use of an all-inclusive "China" is the most potent method of control that the leadership has over its own people. To raise questions about one-party rule – indeed to raise questions about pretty much anything – is to be "anti-China", a dissident.
This year, China's Communist party has faced a perfect storm of stresses. Natural disasters have stretched relief capabilities to their limits, first in the snowstorms at lunar new year, and then in the devastating earthquake. Rioting by Tibetans against Han Chinese has laid bare one of the most sensitive areas of policymaking, both internally and in relations with the west. The Olympic games, which were intended to be China's moment of glory, are threatening to go sour. Grievances about price rises and official corruption have fed protests and, in some cases, riots in the provinces.
Journalists cannot report, because they do not know, what effect this has had on the Communist party leadership, which shows a publicly united front. But it would be naive to think that everything is as harmonious in private. For those skilled in the science of China-watching there are tiny hints that might be cracks in the party response to these crises. China's modern political history shows periods of apparent stability disrupted by violent political rows at the top.
I have lived in China for about 15 years on and off since I first went there in 1981. I was in Beijing until the end of June this year (and will return there in August). My sense, as I spoke to people about the things that were happening, was that there were far greater differences of opinion than at any time since the demonstrations and massacre of 1989.
I encountered angry anti-western sentiment, complaints that the west had not given enough aid to earthquake victims, complaints that western leaders who might boycott the opening ceremony of the Olympics were maliciously spoiling China's moment in the sun.
I also encountered ordinary people – not people who would describe themselves as dissidents – who were furious with their leadership, who described as "stupid" their paranoia about Olympic security. (In Beijing, a security threat might include someone wearing a "Free Tibet" T-shirt). I have heard people say, "Tibet has nothing to do with me, why should I care?". I have heard people rail against propaganda. I have met taxi drivers who get their news from the internet and who can discuss intelligently the differences between Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. In the past, the party exerted control through state-run work units which dispensed healthcare and education as well as birth control and wages. People's lives were absorbed into the sphere of party control. That has largely vanished. The carrot and the stick have gone, people's economic lives are basically their own, and party rule is now largely exerted through a combination of propaganda and damage limitation.
My point is simply that we should be mindful now, more than ever, how we think and write about China. We must distinguish China the nation from the Communist party leadership which dictates policy. We must remember at all times that the Communist party is rarely united and that stability is often an illusion. And most of all we should remember that the vast variation in opinion among the ordinary people who make up China does not make up a monolithic will. The struggle, as it emerges, will not be between "China" and "its critics" – it will be the debate inside China itself.
This article was first published on guardian.co.uk on Monday July 28 2008.
|
| |
02 August 2008 | 11:28:56 PM |
comments (0) |
| Before the Sky Turned Blue |
| |
I wrote this for The Guardian before blue skies swept across Beijing!
Little escape from Beijing's smog
Many Chinese people are beginning to grumble about air quality, but unlike the expatriates they have little choice but to live with it.
-
To those of us who live in Beijing, it's not news that the Olympic host city is horribly polluted. We live in a pall of smog that can press down on us for days on end. It is a fine day when I open the curtains in the morning and can see the sky. The city is transformed. But there are days when I open the curtains and the skyscraper that I know is there, just a few hundred yards away, is so shrouded in smog that I cannot see it. Then my spirits sink.
Beijing's cityscape, with its mirrored tower blocks, and its steel and glass, is a city designed to reflect a blue sky and puffs of white cloud. Smog reflected is smog amplified, and some of the most stunning architectural designs in the world appear as little more than murky shapes. When Ethiopian world record holder Haile Gebrselassie said he would not take part in the marathon in Beijing because he feared the pollution would aggravate his asthma, he raised the question: what about the people who live there?
Expatriates who live in Beijing are there largely out of choice. For the most part, they don't plan to settle for a lifetime in Beijing. They hope that they can get out before the air does their lungs any lasting damage. Those whose lungs protest get out quickly. A couple of years ago, one very clever American entrepreneur spotted what he called "the perfect storm" and has since built a roaring business importing Swiss air purifiers. They cost about £700 each, but many expatriates have several humming constantly in their homes.
But the Chinese population of Beijing has little choice. They are unlikely to be able to leave town – their jobs and families tie them there. Even if they were to move out of Beijing, many of China's other cities offer little better in terms of air quality. Water quality and food quality are equal concerns. For much of the time, we are – expatriates and Chinese alike – in denial. Who can survive, day to day, if they are thinking that every breath they take is toxic? Worse, that every breath their child takes is toxic?
China's astounding growth means that, so far, everyone has turned a blind eye to the appalling quality of the air. For the expatriate, China is the engine of the world economy, and an immensely rewarding place to live and work in many ways. Similarly, many Chinese residents see their own living standards rise with every puff of smoke from a factory chimney.
The lack of a free press has helped to foster a mass delusion. Until recently, most Chinese I met simply referred to smog as "fog" until the newspapers announced there would be a new word – "mai" or "haze". There are now warnings in the press on particularly bad days that children, the elderly and those with heart conditions, should not go outside. These are rare instances of transparency in a system that is generally as opaque as the sky.
The authorities are adept at being economical with the truth. There is no real-time monitoring. So, apart from the truly atrocious days when the government itself issues warnings, it is impossible for schools to know whether it is safe or not to let children out to play. Some western experts have caught the authorities moving the monitoring stations away from more polluted areas. Satellite photography has shown Beijing completely hidden in smog even at times when Chinese officials have said the air quality is acceptable.
Of course, this is pollution that we in the west have exported to China – if the goods that we buy in the shops were all manufactured in Britain, our air would be foul. China's communist government has welcomed the polluting industries because it needs continuously to raise living standards in order to retain its own hold on power. China's population has put up with it so far, partly out of economic necessity, partly out of ignorance fostered by the press, and partly because any act of protest is met with instant retribution.
I will be in Beijing for the Olympics, and I am fascinated to see whether the emergency measures will have the desired effect. I'm not quite sure how I'm going to get my children to school because our car (which has an odd-numbered licence plate) will only be allowed out on odd-numbered days. The measures will be in place from July 20 to September 20 (the end of the Paralympics). For two months, the city will grind almost to a halt, as any enterprise that is judged to be polluting will be temporarily closed down. It's true that the air is generally better at Chinese New Year, when the whole country is on holiday. If the air is clear in August, it will show that where there is a will there is a way. But no government could expect as a permanent measure to close down industry and take half the cars off the road.
Many Chinese people are beginning to grumble about air quality, and to worry about their children. Those with internet access may have seen alarming statistics from the WHO about the numbers of pollution-related cancer deaths. Sometimes, pollution scandals leak onto the internet and embarrass the authorities. Under pressure from the west, China is beginning to take notice of the need to foster greener technologies. There are many ways in which China has leapfrogged the west. It is possible that China's leaders may surprise us all.
This article was first published on guardian.co.uk on Thursday July 10 2008.
|
| |
02 August 2008 | 11:20:46 PM |
comments (0) |
| The Tiananmen Taboo |
| |
Break the Tiananmen taboo
To assume the 1989 massacre has been forgotten by China is to assume the Communist party line

-
Beijing is reported to have forbidden live Olympics coverage from Tiananmen Square. This will be a bitter disappointment to international broadcasters, who would have cherished the exoticism of live pictures from China's most iconic site.
Tiananmen Square, and the massacrethat took place there in 1989 after six weeks of anti-government demonstrations, is one of China's great taboos. Some western commentators say that after nearly 20 years, people in China have forgotten the massacre of June 4, citing the fact that no one talks about it. That is true, no one talks about it. But I would contend that this does not mean it has been forgotten.
Nineteen years on, the Communist party is prepared to offend the western businesses it has spent so much time wooing for fear that some incident – a banner raised, a pot of paint thrown at the portrait of Chairman Mao – will echo the Tiananmen demonstrations, and will be captured on film and broadcast around the world. Nineteen years on, anyone in China typing "June 4" or "Tiananmen massacre" into Google will find their use of the search engine temporarily disabled by China's firewall. It is the party censors who have turned Tiananmen into a taboo, and precisely because they know it has not been forgotten.
Nineteen years ago, I watched from a 14th floor balcony of the Beijing Hotel as an armoured personnel carrier sped down Chang'An Avenue towards Tiananmen Square. I had expected these tank-like vehicles to be slow, lumbering things, but given a good straight urban road they were fast. I was a young foreign correspondent with no experience of war zones. I'd never seen a tracer bullet before, and I was horrified to learn that a tank could crush a bus pulled across the avenue as a roadblock and keep right on going. If June 4 was a nasty shock to me, that night was a tragedy for many families.
Nineteen years on, the house of Zhao Ziyang, the Communist party general secretary who supported the students, is still sealed off, although he is dead. His secretary, Bao Tong, is still under 24-hour surveillance, as is Ding Zilin, the mother of one of those who died.
The massacre was followed by mass arrests and a vicious purge. Those who had protested were forced to lie about their involvement or recant, face disgrace and worse. Of those who took part, hundreds were jailed, and between 50 and 200 are thought to still be imprisoned. Many others fled the country. Some of those have now returned, with foreign passports in their pockets and high-paying jobs in business. But millions came out to demonstrate – every day on the street I probably pass several people who took part.
And yet, in Beijing you almost never hear the words "June 4" uttered. Such is the party's alarm at the words "Six Four" (as the massacre is known) that I am always uncomfortably conscious of the fact that the digits six and four form part of my phone number. To the party, June 4 is a taboo because it fears that open discussion of the massacre would erode party authority. To the man and woman in the street, June 4 is taboo simply because to talk about it remains extremely dangerous.
One result of the taboo is that many young people simply do not know what happened in 1989, and that in itself is a propaganda coup. I have heard of Chinese students first learning about the massacre from foreign students. I am told that most families don't discuss June 4 in front of their children. It's a depressing topic, after all. There was no happy ending. Besides, there is no imminent prospect for change, so what's the point? Parents have seen what can happen to children if they rebel. Better to pretend it never happened, and get on with life.
Getting on with life is subtly different from the "Get a Life" school of thought, which says that June 4 is not a taboo, it's just irrelevant. This line of argument, advanced by some westerners and Chinese, runs thus: "China's moved on. It's not the same place that it was. Get a life." A sub-set of the "Get a Life" approach adds: "No country's perfect, every country commits human rights abuses. Get a life."
For those who want to believe the best of the Communist party – and this includes many people both Chinese and expatriate – there is a third option: "The Communist party really wants to admit that the massacre was wrong but it can't do so until the former leaders who were involved have died."
Traditionally, the Chinese are past masters at putting unpleasant truths behind them temporarily while they do the only thing they can do, which is to get on with life. For the past 19 years, that has meant elbowing for survival and in some cases even for prosperity in a chaotic, booming economy. That's certainly distracting. But getting on with life does not mean forgetting. Every year in Hong Kong, where there is more freedom and where there are many distractions, thousands gather to commemorate the June 4 massacre. When I do broach the topic with Chinese acquaintances, I become convinced that at some point in the not very distant future, June 4 will re-emerge as a political rallying point. Although people almost never bring it up in conversation, it only takes a little gentle encouragement in private to provoke a flood of anguished memory. One woman I know started to talk about a neighbour who had set fire to a petrol can in an effort to slow the advance of the army. "He was executed," she said, still clearly horrified all these years late, "just for that. He wasn't even allowed to see his family at the end." Another woman described how her husband had gone to the square and had seen doctors shot dead even while they were trying to collect the injured.
To assume Tiananmen is forgotten is to assume the party line. There are many people who would like to forget, but that is a different thing. I doubt the silence will go on forever.
This article was first published on guardian.co.uk on Monday June 30 2008. It was last updated at 10:21 on June 30 2008.
|
| |
02 August 2008 | 11:07:42 PM |
comments (0) |
| The Lone Biker |
| |

This is the man I saw in Beijing a few weeks ago, outside the Olympics stadium, who had bicycled all the way across China to support the Olympic games. He sleeps rough. His family thought he was mad when he told them what he intended to do, but he went anyway. He says he'll spend his whole life publicising the Olympics. He is parked, here, next to another man who set off from another province with the same single thought in his head. |
| |
21 July 2008 | 9:49:12 PM |
comments (0) |
| Doping Poster |
| |

This is the poster that has appeared outside our local pharmacy.
The wording:
No illegal sales of Protein Assimilation Preparations and Peptide Hormones. Athletes should be cautious with drugs containing banned substances. |
| |
07 July 2008 | 8:01:39 AM |
comments (0) |
| The Olympic Dragon |
| |

This is the Bird's Nest Olympic stadium, and in the distance Panggu Plaza, which is built to represent a dragon. To the rear of this tall block - you can just see the edge of a roof here - are a series of lower buildings that represent the dragon's back. The screens on the side of the buildings will transmit Olympic programming. Below, there's a close up. You can see a small sphere in the dragon's mouth, intended to represent a pearl. The building houses, as I understand it, a seven star (!?) hotel, as well as luxury office space. When I was there, a week or so ago, it looked as though it had a way to go before it was fully functioning. However, this is Beijing, and there are a whole four weeks before the opening ceremony, so there's plenty of time. The pictures give an idea of the smog which has blanketed the capital recently. The photograph of the Bird's Nest was taken from outside the perimeter fence, which is manned by guards.

|
| |
04 July 2008 | 9:17:57 AM |
comments (0) |
| Riots |
| |
Riots have broken out in Guizhou after the death of a 17-year old girl, Li Shufen. As far as I understand, Li’s body was found in a river. Police said it was a case of drowning, but her family believes she was raped and killed by relatives of local officials. When police insisted that a preliminary investigation had found no evidence of murder, riots broke out involving up to thirty thousand people. Police cleared the crowds with tear gas, and are now patrolling the streets.
State-run media has started broadcasting news identifying rioters as hooligans, which has only enraged people further. Claims and counter-claims have been posted on the internet, many of them taking their arguments beyond the specifics of this case, and complaining of official corruption in general. The authorities are deleting these posts as fast as they appear. Some netizens are posting via sites which re-format their posts so that the lines run vertically rather than horizontally. This is the classic style for writing Chinese, so it's a very elegant way of getting around censors.
This is one of the largest incidents of mass unrest in recent years, and will unsettle the already unsettled Communist Party before the Olympics, likely making them clamp down further on anyone they see as a ‘trouble-maker’.
Every time I ask anyone Chinese why the Communist Party is so obsessed by security at the Olympics they reply, ‘Because they are afraid.’ Incidents like this - and according to official figures there are thousands of smaller riots or demonstrations every year - explain why.
|
| |
02 July 2008 | 3:51:07 PM |
comments (0) |
| An Awfully Patriotic Morning |
| |
This happened a few weeks ago, and before the Sichuan earthquake. For one reason and another, I didn’t post this blog then. Now, however, I am in Scotland on holiday, and so this can serve as archive material to fill the gaping void. It gives a small taste of how patriotism and culture intersect in Beijing at the moment.
One morning this spring, far too early to be properly awake, I headed to the Beijing Youth Palace for a gathering of local choirs. Each choir was to give a brief performance, and I’d signed up to sing as part of a small international group.
The Youth Palace is a former aristocratic residence that is part of the Forbidden City complex. The site was taken over decades ago by the Communist Party and transformed into a maze of practice rooms to nurture children who were identified as particularly musically talented. The traditional courtyards are home to peeling red walls, golden roofs and mythical animals rendered in bronze. At night, one can almost see the ghosts of imperial concubines scurrying through the shadows. A Space Race themed playground, all stars and rockets, hints at another ghost: the Soviet roots of China’s communism.
This morning’s multi-choir extravaganza, the Sounds of Spring, has taken place for the past few years. What I had forgotten is that this is 2008, and therefore what might have been a straightforward celebration of choral music had of course turned into an Olympics-fest.
There were choirs of children, choirs of adults, choirs from kindergartens, choirs from far-flung corners of the city. But all of them, without exception (except us…) were dressed in T shirts in the colours of the Olympic rings. The event was kicked off with a speech about the glories China was about to enjoy as the Olympic host. And almost every song was either Olympic-themed or politically themed, and often both (because, after all, that’s the point).
Some of the inspiring lyrics: “Without the Communist Party There Would Be No New China.” The only western song I identified among the swelling chords and electronic backing tracks was “O Sole Mio”. Except for our programme, that is… still, the gospel song, ‘We Shall Overcome,’ was introduced diplomatically as ‘A traditional English song.’ And the African spiritual that we sang was incomprehensible, so no one will have known that it meant, ‘We March in the Light of God.’ Left to me, we would have translated every word. Not as a political or religious statement, but simply in honour of honesty and so that a different voice was heard. But then that’s why I’m not a diplomat.
It was a good natured event. Outside, the sky grew dark, thunder roared and rain poured down. Inside, under extravagantly painted imperial ceilings, the children waved tinsel pom-poms, sang in perfect harmony and applauded their country’s coming glory. I have never seen such a mass of well-behaved children. The patriotic songs are intended to keep them that way.
|
| |
29 June 2008 | 12:25:13 PM |
comments (3) |
| Tardis |
| |
A couple of hundred yards from our home is the Rosedale Hotel. Suddenly, a couple of days ago, a kiosk landed, like the tardis, on the pavement outside. We have all inspected the kiosk, which so far remains locked and - apparently - unoccupied. On the outside there are pictures of a few foreigners asking directions outside the Olympic stadiums, and a sign saying 'Volunteer.'
But increasingly it looks as though there won't be many foreigners asking directions. Reports are coming in thick and fast of people turned down for visas, even if they have Olympic tickets. One American woman told me her sister had been in a queue in a consulate in the States, in which every single person in the queue was turned away because they had inadequate paperwork. Some of them may sort their papers out - they need hotel vouchers, tickets, flight bookings, etc etc - but some never will, or will still be turned down. China's government is in an alarmingly paranoid mood.
Today I had an alarmingly paranoid taxi driver, who spoke angrily about European leaders who had decided not to attend the Olympic ceremonies. 'Suppose you have a neighbour you don't like, ' he said, 'if his son is getting married, you don't cause trouble on the day.' He told me it didn't matter if foreigners didn't come, Beijing wasn't holding the Games to make money, unlike other countries. He said the most important thing was safety, there had never been an assassination in Beijing since the beginning of the People's Republic, and there wouldn't be at the Games. He happened to liver near the Olympic stadium, and told me that the security guards in his building would all have to leave town because they were migrant workers who would be banished. Because of the building's proximity to the stadia, these doormen would be replaced with People's Armed Police.
I walked around the perimeter fence of the Bird's Nest today. It has become quite a tourist pull, and there were groups of people taking photographs or having their photograph's taken against the backdrop of the building. There were also two men there who had cycled carts to Beijing from in one case Zhejiang and in the other case Yunnan. They sleep in their red and yellow decorated carts, or sleep rough. They had decorated their carts with pro-Olympic slogans. Once I've worked out how to post photos, I'll post some. One had his head shaved in a kind of Olympic sculpture. He said that even once the Olympics were over, he would devote his life to the Olympics. Neither of them had any tickets to attend sports events. They were both, I suspect, pretty close to crazy.
These eccentrics were the one colourful and human splash in what was otherwise a grey, over-sized and bleak landscape. You've all seen photos of the Bird's Nest and the Water Cube. But it was another building that freaked me out. Pangu Plaza is vast - I can't begin to describe it's huge arrogance - and shaped like a dragon, the iconic representation of China. It will house a seven star (seven??) hotel, and an apartment complex offering homes that cost millions of dollars. |
| |
22 June 2008 | 2:56:29 PM |
comments (3) |
| Ted |
| |
| This blog entry has nothing to do with China or with smog. I've stumbled across the most amazing website, and it has lit the light of obsession in my eye. I think everyone should know about it. It is called www.ted.com - the acronym has something to do with technology and design. Apparently - who knew? - there are TED conferences every year at which artists and designers and scientists are invited to speak. Their lectures are posted online on this website. This morning I watched neuroanatomist Jill Bolte Taylor describe her own brain haemorrage. That was after Isabel Allende got stuck buffering, but in general these talks play smoothly and seamlessly. Perhaps if you're living in Britain with the BBC and Channel Four, or in the US with NPR, then this wouldn't be such a big deal. And of course it may be that to everyone living in Britain or the US, Ted itself is old hat. (What? You mean no one's heard of Ted in Beijing?) But if you live on a diet of pirated DVDs (which we don't, of course) then Ted is a breath of fresh air. Which brings us back to the subject of smog.... |
| |
10 June 2008 | 3:31:51 AM |
comments (0) |
| The Official Cheer - with thanks to www.danwei.org |
| |
This just in from the great website www.danwei.org
Featured Video
Posted by Joel Martinsen, June 5, 2008 11:42 AM
This segment from CCTV's Network News introduces an authoritative, four-part Olympic Cheer. Go Olympics! Go Beijing! See below for detailed instructions.
The cheer is a joint product of the Party Office of Spiritual Civilization Development and Guidance (GODPP), the Ministry of Education, BOCOG, and CCTV. Here's an illustrated guide, which will appear on television and promotional posters in the near future:
Step 1: Clap two times (while chanting 奥运, "Olympics") Step 2: Hands in fists with thumbs up, arms extended upward (while chanting, 加油, "Let's go!") Step 3: Clap two time (while chanting 中国, "China") Step 4: Hands in fists, arms extended outward and upward (while chanting 加油, "Let's go!")
Li Ning, president of the Beijing Etiquette Institute, described how the cheer can be adapted to different contexts (from The Beijing News):
At yesterday's ceremony, Li Ning explained that the uniformity of the cheer contained a multitude of variations. It could be "Go Olympics! Go China!" as well as "Go China! Go Yao Ming!" or "Go Brazil! Go Ronaldino!" It will work to give encouragement to every country and athlete in competition.
She said that the civilized cheer "Go Olympics! Go China!" expresses the "Citius, Altius, Fortius" Olympic spirit and is in line with general international principles for cheering, while at the same time possessing characteristics of Chinese culture. Overall, the cheer unites both gestures and words into a smooth, flowing whole.
The Beijing News also reports that students across the country will be trained in the cheer, particularly the 800,000 students who will watch the games on-site. In addition, 448 volunteers will lead spectators in the cheer at both the Olympics and Paralympics.
Links and Sources
|
| |
05 June 2008 | 6:10:47 AM |
comments (0) |
|